Tuesday, February 26, 2008
meditation 3
i've been pretty sceptical about the whole god argument, but in paragraph 41 he says nothing can not come into being out of nothing, and something perfect can not come from someting less perfect. i'm not sure if he's saying there is a god but he is deffinatly implying that there is something out there responsible for creating everything we see. Also it might be a little off topic but he compares reality to perfection. the more reality something contains the more perfect it is.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
i think this was a good find because this could possibly be a way he is trying to prove that things are able to exist the more reality they have.
Post a Comment